I was pretty quiet last Sunday and I found a website to create bike itinerary,\u00a0bikemap.net<\/a>. \u00ab\u00a0Super\u00a0\u00bb, that I said, \u00ab\u00a0and luckily it’s 2012\u00a0\u00bb. Never I would have seen that in 2055 when I crossed Canada. So I did that itinerary\u00a0(look here<\/a>) and I can now prove that the Prairies are not that flat! This website is so well done that it makes you avoid the big highways when you draw your itinerary and once it is done, it generates a graph showing the elevation curve of the way you take.<\/p>\n So I was curious about what is waiting me ahead, and to frighten me a bit I traced what will probably undertake CycloExpedition Americas in the next months. Here are the results, on 7 maps, because this website even allows to import the maps on a external website!<\/p>\n <\/p>\n I could see that my estimation on the distance is not that bad, the maps saying that I will cover 26 237,6 km. But it is with the vertical climb concept that we can have a bit of fun…<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
| <\/td>\n | \n Distance | \n Maximum altitude | \n Vertical climb | \n Ratio v. climb vs distance |
| Canada<\/td>\n | \n 4 094,7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2 006<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 40 540<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 9,9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| United States<\/td>\n | \n 3 051,4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3 451<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 22 390<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 7,3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| Mexico<\/td>\n | \n 3 815,0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3 204<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 39 730<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 10,4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| Central America<\/td>\n | \n 2 666,5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3 272<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 45 700<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 17,1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| Colombia\/Ecuador<\/td>\n | \n 2 383,5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3 602<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 64 590<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 27,1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| Peru\/Bolivia<\/td>\n | \n 3 267,6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4 645<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 81 560<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 25,0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| Chile\/Argentina<\/td>\n | \n 6 958,7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4 895<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 55 470<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8,0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
Total<\/strong><\/td>\n| \n | 26 237,4<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n \u00a04 895<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n 349 980<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n 13,3<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n The worst will be the Peruvian\/Bolivian section, the vertical climb representing 81 560 meters. The total elevation for the whole expedition represents 350 000 meters, or 350 kilometers. To imagine it better (or not), it is 40 times the altitude of Mount Everest ! Fortunately, the saying \u00ab\u00a0What goes up must come down\u00a0\u00bb is valid here…<\/p>\n It is also easy to calculate the ratio of vertical climb per kilometers on the road. In United States, for example, even if I’ll bike in higher altitude than Canada, I’ll climb less (7,3 m\/km vs 9,9 m\/km). The most difficult section will be Colombia and Ecuador, with 27,1 m\/km. To represent the total average of 13,3 m\/km, we could say that, if there weren’t any geographical obstacles, this trip would be 13 000 km uphill faux-plat<\/em> of 2,66%, followed by a similar downhill…<\/p>\n Fortunately, this trip won’t be only a statistical representation!<\/p>\n Here are the maps:<\/p>\n (Update: the maps being reused and modified through the time for summarized-articles on traveled countries, the data might be different from the above table)<\/p>\n Canada<\/strong><\/p>\n |